Which concrete example is documented in the source-backed class literary works?

Answer options

• Option: Latin script
  "Latin script" vs. "Alice in Wonderland" Latin script is source-backed as a; misses the target mapping. Latin script stays thematically plausible but misses the requested target. The task targets this mapping, so Latin script remains wrong in this prompt. Latin script stays relevant in the graph profile but does not carry the requested relation.
• Option: Magna Carta
  "Magna Carta" vs. "Alice in Wonderland" Magna Carta is source-backed as a; misses the target mapping. Magna Carta stays thematically plausible but misses the requested target. The task targets this mapping, so Magna Carta remains wrong in this prompt. Magna Carta stays relevant in the graph profile but does not carry the requested relation.
• Option: euro
  "euro" vs. "Alice in Wonderland" The euro is source-backed as a currency; misses the target mapping. euro stays thematically plausible but misses the requested target. The task targets this mapping, so euro remains wrong in this prompt. euro stays relevant in the graph profile but does not carry the requested relation.
• Correct: Alice in Wonderland
  "Alice in Wonderland" - target Alice in Wonderland is source-backed as a literary work from. Alice in Wonderland matches the requested target of this prompt most precisely. The task targets this mapping, and Alice in Wonderland remains correct in this prompt. Alice in Wonderland remains tied to the requested relation through direct in the graph profile.

Solution

Alice in Wonderland

"Alice in Wonderland" is correct: Alice in Wonderland is source-backed as a literary work from the media_book pool. The prompt targets Alice in Wonderland, so the graph keeps this mapping stable against close alternatives. Source: Wikidata. As of: 2026-02-13.

Fun fact

Alice in Wonderland stays anchored with additional dataset context. The graph therefore uses a direct graph path.