P PRISMA SEO

STEM

Which value is documented for Silver under the source-backed "atomic number" attribute?

"47" is correct: 47 is stored as the atomic-number claim for silver and stays in the same attribute 47 carries the additional dataset detail 47 47 - Profile: "47" - target "47" - target 47 is stored as the atomic-number claim for silver and stays in.

47 hard

Answer options

  • Option: 26
    "26" vs. "47" 26 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping. 26 uses attribute atomic_number. The task targets this mapping, so 26 remains wrong in this prompt. 26 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison.
  • Option: 79
    "79" vs. "47" 79 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping. 79 uses attribute atomic_number. The task targets this mapping, so 79 remains wrong in this prompt. 79 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison.
  • Option: 29
    "29" vs. "47" 29 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping. 29 uses attribute atomic_number. The task targets this mapping, so 29 remains wrong in this prompt. 29 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison.
  • Correct: 47
    "47" - target 47 is stored as the atomic-number claim for silver and stays in. 47 uses attribute atomic_number. The task targets this mapping, and 47 remains correct in this prompt. 47 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison.

Solution

47

"47" is correct: 47 is stored as the atomic-number claim for silver and stays in the same attribute. The prompt targets 47, so the graph keeps this mapping stable against close alternatives. Source: Wikidata. As of: 2026-02-13.

Fun fact

47 carries the additional dataset detail 47. The graph therefore uses a graph attribute.

Category:STEM

Knowledge panorama

Option ProfileCore factContextContrastResolutionOptionCategorySourceRelationTarget
26 "26" vs. "47"26 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping26 uses attribute atomic_numberThe task targets this mapping, so 26 remains wrong in this prompt26 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison26Wirtschaftliche Folgen von ForschungsinstituteWikidata (2026-02-13)Technikgeschichte und InnovationForschungsinstitute
79 "79" vs. "47"79 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping79 uses attribute atomic_numberThe task targets this mapping, so 79 remains wrong in this prompt79 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison79Wirtschaftliche Folgen von ForschungsinstituteWikidata (2026-02-13)Technikgeschichte und InnovationForschungsinstitute
29 "29" vs. "47"29 is stored as the atomic-number claim; misses the target mapping29 uses attribute atomic_numberThe task targets this mapping, so 29 remains wrong in this prompt29 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison29Wirtschaftliche Folgen von ForschungsinstituteWikidata (2026-02-13)Technikgeschichte und InnovationForschungsinstitute
47 "47" - target47 is stored as the atomic-number claim for silver and stays in47 uses attribute atomic_numberThe task targets this mapping, and 47 remains correct in this prompt47 remains a separate periodic-table entry in this comparison47Wirtschaftliche Folgen von ForschungsinstituteWikidata (2026-02-13)Technikgeschichte und InnovationForschungsinstitute